ABS-CBN exclusive interview with Hayden kho’s mother and after a while Lolit Solis reply at GMA7
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Read more...
Loopholes on Dr. Hayden Kho’s statements on Hayden kho scandal issue
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Read more...
Everythingscandalous.org Got deleted running away from the heat of hayden scandal
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Read more...
6 Big Myths about copyright (For bloggers.)
Blogger and Journalist are different in terms of knowledge and awareness, Journalist knows all the legal matters specially the rights to privacy and they all knew everything about copyrighted images and plagiarism.
Plagiarism is an act of ‘claiming’ a copyrighted works, if an individual got a copy of any copyrighted work without permission but didn’t claim them as theirs it would never be an act of plagiarism, it would be a violation of copyright law.
Bloggers on the other hand are complicated itself a blogger can be anyone including children they might have lock of awareness towards everything and it has always been the main problem on blogging communities.
Copying and embedding images became tolerable as long as you don’t earn from them, such as personal journals and diaries as long as you share your traffic to them by including a link back.
One reason why it is tolerable is in fact explained by Brad Templeton on the very last paragraph of this article.
But on the other hand if an individual owns a blog which was well monetized then it only means that they already know what they are doing, leaning how to monetize their site means "ignorance is not an excuse".
These are the 6 Big Myths about copyright.
1. "If it doesn't have a copyright symbol, it's not copyrighted."
This was true before april 1, 1989 after the Berne copyright convention, everything after that date was copyrighted the moment an individual finished his works.
2. "If I don't charge for it, it's not a violation."
False. Whether you have been charge or not it will still be a violation., -- and there can still be serious damages if you hurt the commercial value of the property, Specially those photographers who show their photo gallery in public and expect someone will email them and buy it from them but instead someone just took it without permission.
3. "My posting was under fair use!"
The "fair use" exemption to (U.S.) copyright law was created to allow things such as commentary, parody, news reporting, research and education about copyrighted works without the permission of the author. (This includes Xerox copying of certain page on books and other learning material.)
But selling them is not or even near under the terms of Fair Use, damage to the commercial value of the work must be consider at all means, this includes posting them online for free but profiting by the use of advertising such as adsense.
4. "If I make up my own stories, but base them on another work, my new work belongs to me."
False. U.S. Copyright law is quite explicit that the making of what are called "derivative works". These have been fully explained on Creative Commons license. fan fictions are among them.
5. "They can't get me, defendants in court have powerful rights!"
Copyright law is mostly civil law. If you violate copyright you would usually get sued, not be charged with a crime. "Innocent until proven guilty" is a principle of criminal law, as is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt." Sorry, but in copyright suits, these don't apply the same way or at all. It's mostly which side and set of evidence the judge or jury accepts or believes more, though the rules vary based on the type of infringement. In civil cases you can even be made to testify against your own interests.
-Brad Templeton
6. "It doesn't hurt anybody -- in fact it's free advertising."
It's up to the owner to decide if they want the free ads or not. If they want them, they will be sure to contact you. Don't rationalize whether it hurts the owner or not, ask them. Usually that's not too hard to do.
As a blogger and a former software developer, I must frequently deal with copyright issues. For most of my adult life, intellectual property has been my primary source of livelihood and remains so to this day. While some people take issue with the concept of intellectual property and believe that all content should be free, I don’t count myself among them. In fact, for the most part I consider the anti-copyright fanatics rather juvenile and intellectually immature. Too often their utopian language is merely a hollow shell around the desire to get something for nothing.
……
If you ever find a copyright thief generating income from your content, a few emails to their income providers will usually get their accounts banned and their funds seized. For example, if you see someone using Adsense to monetize your stolen content, you can just report it to Google to get the thief banned from Adsense and their existing funds seized. I sort of wonder what Google does with the money that’s been seized though — they certainly don’t give it to the original copyright holder. Do they refund it to the advertisers, donate it to charity, or just keep it? What about the money already paid out? In any event you’ll have to decide whether you want to go that route. I only recommend going after income sources when infringement is clearly deliberate and the person doesn’t respond to a direct request.
In most cases all you need to do to remedy a copyright violation is to expose the copyright thief to such a degree that they realize it’s in their best interest to go legal.
by Steve Pavlina
it must be remembered that copyright has two main purposes, namely the protection of the author's right to obtain commercial benefit from valuable work, and more recently the protection of the author's general right to control how a work is used.
While copyright law makes it technically illegal to reproduce almost any new creative work (other than under fair use) without permission, if the work is unregistered and has no real commercial value, it gets very little protection. The author in this case can sue for an injunction against the publication, actual damages from a violation, and possibly court costs. Actual damages means actual money potentially lost by the author due to publication, plus any money gained by the defendant. But if a work has no commercial value, such as a typical E-mail message or conversational USENET posting, the actual damages will be zero. Only the most vindictive (and rich) author would sue when no damages are possible, and the courts don't look kindly on vindictive plaintiffs, unless the defendants are even more vindictive.
- by Brad Templeton
Just like Steve Pavlina stated above, a lot of them are juvenile and intellectually immature. they think copyright law is as simple as they think, and just like Brad Templeton stated only the most vindictive author would sue when no damages are possible, some of them are ticking time bomb once your blog became popular enough (pra gatasan) that's the time they will sue you, if you don't want this to happen ask permission before you post a copyrighted images if you got a permission save them in a safe place, if they ask for payments always ask for an invoice usually those prof. freelancer has freeshbook account. (i do have one) (if you've have a friend who are a profesional photgrapher, ask them)
Just like what I said on my last post, nakakatuwa ang blog ng TNL, pero umayos kayo.
sa mga nag comment sa unang post ko sa Author og HAY!MEN tunay na lalake?, sa susunod wag puro ego, matutong mag hanap ng fact, nakakahiya naman yung isa galing pa ng UP.
kaya ko maging kagaya nyo in 1 second, WAASSSAAAKK!!! taena mga tunay na lalake kayo!! hahaha.
Read more...
Authors of HAY!MEN tunay na lalake?
Sorry for those English readers.
Mga Author ng tunaynalalake.blogspot.com tunay nga bang lalake? Ayun sa kanilang manifesto and tunay na lalake ay…
1. Ang tunay na lalake ay di natutulog.
2. Ang tunay na lalake ay di nagte-text-back, maliban na lang kung papasahan ng load. Gayunpaman, laging malabo ang kanyang mga sagot.
3. Ang tunay na lalake ay laging may extra rice.
4. Ang tunay na lalake ay hindi vegetarian.
5. Ang tunay na lalake ay walang abs.
6. Ang tunay na lalake ay hindi sumasayaw.
7. Ang tunay na lalake ay umaamin ng pagkakamali sa kapwa tunay na lalake.
8. Ang tunay na lalake ay laging may tae sa brief.
9. Ang tunay na lalake ay di naghuhugas ng pinagkainan o nagliligpit ng kanyang mga gamit dahil may babaeng gagawa noon para sa kanya. Mas lalong nagiging tunay ang pagkalalake kung di niya kilala o di niya maalala ang pangalan ng babae.
10. Ang tunay na lalake ay di nagsisimba.
Mula sa blog ng mga tunay ng lalake..
English translation straight to the point.
1. They have insomnia
2. They don't care
3. They sell extra rice.
4. They are not healthy.
5. They are not healthy. (hindi yan nagkamali.. vegetable supplement.)
6. They suck
7. They don't have girls.
8. They smells bad
9. Lazy, they trust anyone, and forgetful.
10. They never seen a real good girls.
Ayun sa kanilang manifesto ang tunay na lalake ay hindi natutulog.
Kayo na ang mag husga.
ang Tunay na lalake hindi nangungulekta ng imahe ng binabae at tunay na lalake.
at ang tunay na lalake.. Babae lang lagi ang pinag-uusapan, ang tunay na lalake masaya kapag madaming babae ang nag iiwan ng kommento sa kanilang blog.
bago ang lahat hindi nga pla nila alam ang copyright law, it's not enough to post the link of any copyrighted image and/or copyrighted photo on your article, you need to notify the site owner or the photographer itself and have their permission to share you some of its right to 'copy'.
copyright are being made the moment a photographer shoot on his camera or an artist stroke his brush unlike trademarks and patent which they need to file a document before they will be considered yours.
copyrights is simple as "rights to copy", if the owner didn't give you any permission or rights to copy his/her images then you don't have the right to post them anywhere. there are some circumstances that we can use a copyrighted photo without notifying the owner, if the owner upload his works on a free stock photo (such as http://www.sxc.hu/) and/or had declare a certain CC (creative commons) license such as attribution,no-derivatives and share alike.
This can be found on bottom most right side bar of flickr.com. every profesional photographer never wish to have their photos posted the way they don't want to and scratch their reputation, so if you want your life to be respected... you know what you need to do. (click image for large preview)
ang tunay na lalake may lakas ng loob lumapit kahit kaninu at huminge ng permiso kahit pa presidente pa sya ng amerika.
Hindi ata alam ng mga taong to kung bakit binuo ang website ng picapp.com ang akala ata nila ganoon lang kasimple humakot ng images.
(kuha lang ng kuha ng picture kung saan saan... anu kayo birthday?? nakakatuwa ang blog nyo kahit wala kwenta marami natutuwa, pero sana umayos kayo ah.. napaghahalata kasing utak ipis kayo, pag may nagalit sa mga binibiro nyong malaking tao mag mumukha kayong mangmang.)
Read more...
Everythingscandalous.org where you can find the latest mobile scandal
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Read more...
Floyd Mayweather SR. is a piece of trash, putting Ricky Hatton in shame.
We all knew how much Floyd Mayweather SR. trash talks Freddie Roach and keeps on creating useless kids poem (like he thinks his age will decrease by doing those things), we can not ask him to "come on men, grow up" coz he is already on his peak.
First, He didn't teach Hatton the defense instead he make him tougher, could they weight how much tough he needs if the both of them don't know how hard many pacquiao's punch? Yeah he could be over tough but there is no tough person who could stand until the end if he continuously receives punches. (That's unprofessional.).
Second, How could you pay for a trainer who's always Late? Being an athlete comes with a word ‘Discipline' and it always being a part of punctuality, 20 miles away from the gym is not an excuse. (That's Laziness).
Third, He doesn't accompany Ricky to the ring, it's like saying "Hey don't put your name on me ok? We are not that close", just like how he insult Ricky's Hometown, saying"The Food are garbage" and "I go where I have to because it's business but as soon as I'm finished I'm out of there". (click here for more info)
Fourth, after the fight he just leaves and says nothing to the media other than "Ricky Hatton should retire". Is that an attitude of a couch who keeps on saying his fighter is the best? Where's the big mouth of his? (Read some of his kiddies poet in boxnews.)Floyd Mayweather SR. Should retire, even if he doesn't want to, he could not stop his faith coz the net will do it for him, those upcoming boxers who are searching for more info about Floyd Mayweather SR will bumped in here and to those other articles like this.
Floyd sr. got Oscar when he already knew how to fight. He trained Dawson after he already knew how to fight, and we don't know the real reason why his son (Floyd Mayweather JR.) Fired him before he became one of the best pound for pound fighter, but base from these info, SR. doesn't have a complete reputation at all. (leechers)
Floyd Mayweather sr should not be blamed, he did the best he could by his fighter but when the moment came he ‘didn't listen'."and I say... that was all responsibility of a trainer, He should have trained his fighter to listen, he should have been more Strict and Firm, floyd once says : "
When I came in, he doesn't know how to box",and the First thing a boxer needs to know is discipline. (But I don't think floyd Sr has that, proven with such an attitude.)
Floyd Mayweather SR only comes after the money, he might be a legend but he doesn't know couching, he don't know his student well (He didn't even see the loophole on hatton's style, like how Freddie Roach sees it), Floyd Mayweather SR is a piece of trash. He's a crap trainer, a scumbag, an egomaniac who wants to fight, he sees boxing as war zone not a sport.
Hatton could be a great fighter if only this old Mayweather doesn't show up.
Read more...